Proload Express vs Averitt Express: LTL Freight Comparison
Averitt is a strong regional carrier with excellent Southeast service. Proload gives access to Averitt plus 200+ additional carriers for broader coverage and better pricing competition.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Proload Express | Averitt Express |
|---|---|---|
| Carrier Options | 200+ carriers | Single carrier or limited |
| Pricing | Guaranteed lowest - rate competition | Single rate structure |
| Online Quoting | Instant, 24/7 | Varies by provider |
| Real-Time Tracking | Full visibility, automated | Carrier-dependent |
| Account Manager | Dedicated person, knows your lanes | Call center or varies |
| Claims Resolution | Proactive, under 30 days average | Standard carrier policy |
| Setup Time | Same-day onboarding | Days to weeks |
| Volume Minimum | None | Often required |
Comparison based on publicly available information and customer feedback. Results may vary by lane and volume.
Why Shippers Choose Proload Express
What Shippers Who Switched Say
"Averitt remained in our mix, but Proload unlocked better costs in non-core lanes."
"We gained national flexibility without sacrificing Southeast performance."
More Comparisons
Proload Express vs Top LTL Alternatives
Choosing the best LTL freight company depends on your lanes, shipment profile, and service requirements. This comparison highlights where a multi-carrier approach produces better outcomes.
Proload Express vs Old Dominion Freight
Old Dominion is consistently among the most reliable LTL carriers in the US and is included in our network. Proload lets you use ODFL on lanes where it excels while keeping competitive alternatives available where needed.
Proload Express vs Estes Express
Estes has strong regional coverage and a reputation for service quality. As part of Proload's network, Estes capacity can be used alongside 200+ carriers competing on each lane.
Proload Express vs Direct Carrier
Using an LTL broker vs going direct to a carrier depends on lane diversity, team capacity, and pricing objectives. This page compares both approaches and where Proload's multi-carrier model wins.